Users login

Create an account »

JOIN XATRIX

Users login

Home » Hacking News » Mass ICQ 'hack' ???

Mass ICQ 'hack' ???

by Nikola Strahija on February 23rd, 2002 "We have received evidence which suggests a mass hack of ICQ has taken place - but neither AOL or security experts can come up with an explanation."-said some source from theregister.co.uk.


Lots of accounts had suddenly become disconnected and the passwords no longer work. The email addresses were changed to '[email protected]'.

A search of the ICQ whitepages reveals hundreds of accounts all with that same address (registered in places such as China and Egypt), and we began to suspect some kind of mass hack had been carried out.

Beyond telling us that it takes security "very seriously" and AOL was unable to shed any light on the issue. Its techies are looking into the issue, we were assured, but after 48 hours they've still to get back to us.

AV vendor Sophos and security consultants MIS Corporate Defence was contact.

Neither could account for the 'hack', though MIS did point to a hijack exploit dating from 1998, but AOL has since updated its software and we very much doubt this accounts for what has happened.

The problem could possibly be the upshot of a recently discovered remotely exploitable buffer overflow glitch with ICQ, but our source doubts that this is the case, either.

With newer versions of ICQ your contact list gets stored on its server and can be retrieved at any computer with ICQ and the correct password. So if the accounts have been cracked, somebody could harvest this potentially sensitive information.

Deathrow.com appears to be a gaming software company but our emails to it failed to get through, so that avenue of enquiry has yielded a blank.


Newsletter signup

Signup to our monthly newsletter and stay in touch with IT news!

Free E-books

We've got ebooks! But they're not online. :( Please give us a few days to bring downloads back.

Contact

Have something to say or just wanna drop us a line? Please keep this in mind: to spam, we reply with spam.

Contact us »